YOY Mimarlık & Tasarım Ltd. Şti. Restoration / Architecture · Design and Construction

Historic City Centre · ANTAKYA, HATAY

District 3, Parcel 407 — Reconstruction Project

The project covers the measured survey, restitution and reconstruction of the building. The surviving parts of the structure, severely damaged in the February 2023 earthquakes, were documented by measured survey; the 1929 French cadastral sheet, archive photographs and an oral history study were assessed together to form the restitution decisions, and the reconstruction projects were prepared in the light of the resulting data.

Location
District 3, Parcel 407
Typology
HOUSE
Project type
RECONSTRUCTION
Status
SEVERELY DAMAGED · MEASURED SURVEY, RESTITUTION AND RECONSTRUCTION COMPLETED
Year
2025
Scales
1/500 · 1/200 · 1/50 · 1/20
Approving authority
Hatay Regional Board for the Conservation of Cultural Property
District 3, Parcel 407 — Reconstruction Project — Gazipaşa Sokağı · northeast elevation
Gazipaşa Sokağı · northeast elevation

About the Project

The project covers the measured survey, restitution and reconstruction of the building. The surviving parts of the structure, severely damaged in the February 2023 earthquakes, were documented by measured survey; the 1929 French cadastral sheet, archive photographs and an oral history study were assessed together to form the restitution decisions, and the reconstruction projects were prepared in the light of the resulting data.

Urban Context

Parcel 407 in District 3 lies within the area covered by the Conservation-Oriented Development Plan of the Antakya Historic City Centre. The site plan of the building, which stands on Gazipaşa Sokağı adjoining its neighbouring parcels, was taken from the 1929 Ville d’Antioche cadastral sheet. Because a large number of immovable cultural properties stand in its immediate surroundings, the building has been assessed within the integrity of the historic fabric, and conservation and design decisions were developed with regard to the facade silhouette, the building height and the relationships with street and courtyard.

Parcel 407 on the 1929 Ville d’Antioche cadastral sheet
Parcel 407 on the 1929 Ville d’Antioche cadastral sheet
The arched elevation facing the courtyard — after the earthquake
The arched elevation facing the courtyard — after the earthquake
The collapsed upper floor and roof covering
The collapsed upper floor and roof covering

The Project in Numbers

407
parcel

District 3, Antakya

58
drawings

Separated from three submitted sheets

06
stages

From assessment to construction

1/20
scale

Closest working scale

Project Process

01

Condition Assessment

After the February 2023 earthquakes the building, which stands within the Antakya Urban Conservation Area, was severely damaged: the arched elevation facing the courtyard remained standing, while the upper floor structure and roof covering largely collapsed. The work was therefore conceived as a condition assessment that carries out, together, the measured documentation of the surviving parts and the reading of traces in the collapsed ones. Fractures in the structural system, vertical and horizontal displacements, material losses and the architectural elements that could be preserved in situ were each recorded separately; the spatial organisation and original architectural features of the building were reread by assessing them alongside archival documents and an oral history study. The limits of both the fabric to be preserved and the parts to be rebuilt were thus defined on documentary grounds.

The existing condition after the earthquake — the collapsed upper floor and the surviving arched elevation
The existing condition after the earthquake — the collapsed upper floor and the surviving arched elevation

BasisVenice Charter art. 16 · Law No. 2863 · Regional Conservation Board notification

02

Measured Survey

The surviving parts of the building were documented by measured survey. Floor plans, floor and ceiling plans, a roof plan, the street elevation and five sections from AA to EE were produced, and the stone elements, joinery and door details were additionally drawn at 1/20 scale.

The survey sheets record not only geometry but also material and decay information: stone masonry walls, fine dressed stone facing, ashlar surrounds and bağdadi partitions are shown with separate hatchings, while decay such as cracking, detachment, damp and vegetation growth is marked against a legend.

Drawings from the measured survey sheet that describe this stage

GROUND FLOOR PLAN — District 3, Parcel 407
GROUND FLOOR PLAN
GAZİPAŞA SOKAĞI ELEVATION — District 3, Parcel 407
GAZİPAŞA SOKAĞI ELEVATION
SECTION AA — District 3, Parcel 407
SECTION AA

BasisVenice Charter art. 16 · Law No. 2863

03

Restitution

Restitution is the evidence-based reconstruction of the building’s original state before it was damaged. On this parcel the work rests on the 1929 Ville d’Antioche cadastral sheet, archive photographs, a comparative reading of similar buildings on neighbouring parcels and an oral history study.

On the sheet, every restitution decision is marked against a three-level reliability legend: decisions confirmed by traces in the building and by period documents are shown as first degree, those based on comparative study of similar buildings as second degree, and those for which there is insufficient data and which remain proposals as third degree. It therefore stays legible on the drawing which information rests on evidence and which on interpretation.

Plan and elevation decisions from the restitution sheet

GROUND FLOOR PLAN — District 3, Parcel 407
GROUND FLOOR PLAN
GAZİPAŞA SOKAĞI ELEVATION — District 3, Parcel 407
GAZİPAŞA SOKAĞI ELEVATION
RELIABILITY LEGEND — District 3, Parcel 407
RELIABILITY LEGEND

BasisVenice Charter art. 9–13 · Nara Document on Authenticity

04

Restoration Decisions

For the surviving parts, the principle of minimum intervention was taken as the basis: the arched courtyard elevation, the stone surrounds and the walls preserved in situ were retained and consolidated, while rebuilding was decided for the lost parts. Keeping the distinction between original and new legible was defined at the level of material and joint.

Material and construction-system decisions

WINDOW AND DOOR DETAILS — District 3, Parcel 407
WINDOW AND DOOR DETAILS
SECTION CC — District 3, Parcel 407
SECTION CC

BasisVenice Charter art. 9–12 · Law No. 2863

05

Reconstruction

The reconstruction project defines the rebuilding of the original configuration established in the restitution, together with current building-safety requirements. The collapsed upper floor, roof covering and fallen walls have been rebuilt while preserving the original envelope, floor heights and facade order.

The rhythm of the arched courtyard elevation, the proportions of its openings and the arrangement of the stone surrounds have been drawn in keeping with the restitution data; the roof is defined with its original pitch and eaves projection and an alaturka tile covering.

Elevations and sections from the reconstruction sheet

GAZİPAŞA SOKAĞI ELEVATION — District 3, Parcel 407
GAZİPAŞA SOKAĞI ELEVATION
SECTION AA — District 3, Parcel 407
SECTION AA
ROOF PLAN — District 3, Parcel 407
ROOF PLAN

BasisVenice Charter art. 15 · Riga Charter · Regional Conservation Board approval

06

Construction and Supervision

The construction stage is the process of producing the exact counterpart of the approved project on site. Door, window, cupboard and mahmel (niche) details were drawn at working scale, and the frame, sill and stone-wall junction details of the timber joinery were defined individually.

Traditional construction details at working scale

JOINERY AND CUPBOARD DETAILS — District 3, Parcel 407
JOINERY AND CUPBOARD DETAILS
MAHMEL (NICHE) AND DOOR DETAILS — District 3, Parcel 407
MAHMEL (NICHE) AND DOOR DETAILS

BasisVenice Charter art. 16 · Construction supervision and archiving

Typology of Building Elements

TYPOLOGY 1

Hipped Roof Clad in Alaturka Tiles

Because Antakya has heavy rainfall, roofs are steep and pitched; all are hipped roofs clad in alaturka tiles. The eaves project over the street, giving shade and protecting the walls from rain. In this building the roof covering largely collapsed in the earthquake and was rebuilt in the reconstruction with its original pitch and eaves arrangement.

Roof plan — reconstruction
Roof plan — reconstruction
TYPOLOGY 2

Arched Courtyard Elevation

The elevation facing the courtyard is built from a row of segmentally arched openings. The arcade both produces a shaded passage and defines the architectural identity of the courtyard. Although the upper floor collapsed in the earthquake, this arcade largely survived and became one of the strongest pieces of evidence for the restitution.

Gazipaşa Sokağı elevation — restitution
Gazipaşa Sokağı elevation — restitution
TYPOLOGY 3

Arched and Flat Windows

The windows are double-leaf units built with box-section timber profiles; alongside straight-headed examples there are openings spanned by a segmental arch. The stone surround and sill define the detail where the opening meets the stone wall, and the upper-floor windows are protected by timber shutters.

Window and joinery details — restitution
Window and joinery details — restitution
TYPOLOGY 4

The Courtyard’s External Stair

Access to the upper floor is by an external stone stair rising within the courtyard. The stair is not only a circulation element: the space beneath it becomes storage or a shaded area, and its landing becomes part of courtyard life. The wrought-iron balustrade joins the rhythm of the elevation.

Section FF — the relationship between stair and courtyard
Section FF — the relationship between stair and courtyard
TYPOLOGY 5

The Courtyard — Centre of the House

The courtyard is the most important space in the house; through the long summer, much of daily life is spent there. In the plan it is central, working like a “sofa” hall that links every unit. The rooms are arranged on one, two or three sides of it.

Ground floor plan — restitution
Ground floor plan — restitution
TYPOLOGY 6

Street Elevation and Silhouette

On the ground floor the thick walls are faced in fine dressed stone, with ashlar surrounds framing the openings. The blank street elevation gains rhythm from the upper-floor windows and the projecting eaves; in this language the building takes its place in the Gazipaşa Sokağı silhouette.

Gazipaşa Sokağı elevation — reconstruction
Gazipaşa Sokağı elevation — reconstruction

Project Sheets

Measured Survey Sheets

Measured documentation of the existing condition after the earthquake

  • GROUND FLOOR PLAN
  • FIRST FLOOR PLAN
  • GROUND FLOOR STRUCTURE PLAN
  • FIRST FLOOR STRUCTURE PLAN
  • GROUND FLOOR CEILING PLAN
  • FIRST FLOOR CEILING PLAN
  • ROOF PLAN
  • GAZİPAŞA SOKAĞI ELEVATION
  • SECTION AA
  • SECTION BB
  • SECTION CC
  • SECTION DD
  • SECTION EE
  • CADASTRAL SITUATION
  • SITE PLAN
  • STONE ELEMENT DETAILS
  • PLAN DETAILS
  • SECTION AND DOOR DETAILS

Restitution — Plans

Evidence-based redrawing of the building’s original spatial organisation

  • GROUND FLOOR PLAN
  • FIRST FLOOR PLAN
  • GROUND FLOOR STRUCTURE PLAN
  • FIRST FLOOR STRUCTURE PLAN
  • GROUND FLOOR CEILING PLAN
  • FIRST FLOOR CEILING PLAN
  • ROOF PLAN
  • CADASTRAL SITUATION
  • SITE PLAN
  • LICENSED SURVEY (LİHKAB) BOUNDARY
  • MATERIAL AND RELIABILITY LEGEND

Restitution — Elevations and Sections

Its place in the street silhouette and the vertical spatial organisation

  • GAZİPAŞA SOKAĞI ELEVATION
  • SECTION AA
  • SECTION BB
  • SECTION CC
  • SECTION DD
  • SECTION EE
  • SECTION FF

Restitution — Architectural Details

Documenting doors, windows and timber elements

  • WINDOW AND DOOR DETAILS
  • JOINERY AND CUPBOARD DETAILS
  • MAHMEL (NICHE) AND DOOR DETAILS

Reconstruction — Plans

The plan level of the document-based rebuilding decisions

  • GROUND FLOOR PLAN
  • FIRST FLOOR PLAN
  • GROUND FLOOR STRUCTURE PLAN
  • FIRST FLOOR STRUCTURE PLAN
  • GROUND FLOOR CEILING PLAN
  • FIRST FLOOR CEILING PLAN
  • ROOF PLAN
  • CADASTRAL SITUATION
  • SITE PLAN
  • LICENSED SURVEY (LİHKAB) BOUNDARY

Reconstruction — Elevations and Sections

Re-establishing the original building envelope and facade order

  • GAZİPAŞA SOKAĞI ELEVATION
  • SECTION AA
  • SECTION BB
  • SECTION CC
  • SECTION DD
  • SECTION EE
  • SECTION FF

Reconstruction — Construction Details

Traditional building techniques described at working scale

  • WINDOW AND DOOR DETAILS
  • JOINERY AND CUPBOARD DETAILS
  • MAHMEL (NICHE) AND DOOR DETAILS

Project Team

  • Yonca Yılmaz Çelebi
    M.Arch · Conservation Specialist
  • Burcu Özlüoğlu
    Architect
  • Eda Yabancı
    Conservator

Method and Sources

The sequence followed in this file — documentation, diagnosis, evidence-based restitution, repair with minimum intervention — is the established method of the conservation literature. Intervention decisions were taken on the principles that repair must not begin before the cause of damage has been diagnosed, and that the degree of intervention rises from consolidation towards reconstruction only as far as necessity requires. For the theoretical framework see Zeynep Ahunbay, Tarihi Çevre Koruma ve Restorasyon (YEM Yayın, 2009); for the principles, the Venice Charter (1964), the Nara Document on Authenticity (1994) and Turkish Law No. 2863 on the Conservation of Cultural and Natural Property.

Services applied in this project

Related projects

View the project in presentation format

The submitted drawings, process account and typology cards for this parcel are available at full resolution in the horizontal presentation on the site.